Expected map for runtime field fieldName definition but got a – How to solve this Elasticsearch exception

Opster Team

August-23, Version: 7.11-7.15

Briefly, this error occurs when Elasticsearch expects a map (a data structure consisting of key-value pairs) for defining a runtime field, but it receives a different data type. This could be due to incorrect data input or a mismatch in the expected data structure. To resolve this issue, ensure that the runtime field definition is correctly formatted as a map. Also, check the data type of the input to ensure it matches the expected map structure. If the error persists, review your Elasticsearch schema for potential inconsistencies.

This guide will help you check for common problems that cause the log ” Expected map for runtime field [” + fieldName + “] definition but got a ” to appear. To understand the issues related to this log, read the explanation below about the following Elasticsearch concepts: index.

Log Context

Log “Expected map for runtime field [” + fieldName + “] definition but got a ” class name is RuntimeField.java. We extracted the following from Elasticsearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :

 runtimeFields.put(fieldName; builder.apply(typeParser.parse(fieldName; propNode; parserContext)));
 propNode.remove("type");
 MappingParser.checkNoRemainingFields(fieldName; propNode);
 iterator.remove();
 } else {
 throw new MapperParsingException("Expected map for runtime field [" + fieldName + "] definition but got a "
 + entry.getValue().getClass().getName());
 }
 }
 return Collections.unmodifiableMap(runtimeFields);
 }

 

How helpful was this guide?

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?