The security index mapping is for version but API Key metadata requires – How to solve this Elasticsearch error

Opster Team

Aug-23, Version: 7.13-7.15

Briefly, this error occurs when there is a mismatch between the version of the security index mapping and the API Key metadata requirements. This could be due to an upgrade or changes in the Elasticsearch configuration. To resolve this issue, you can try updating the security index to match the required version. Alternatively, you can recreate the API Key with the correct metadata requirements. Also, ensure that the Elasticsearch cluster is correctly configured and all nodes are running the same version.

This guide will help you check for common problems that cause the log ” The security index [{}] mapping is for version [{}] but API Key metadata requires [{}]; ” to appear. To understand the issues related to this log, read the explanation below about the following Elasticsearch concepts: index, plugin, mapping, version, metadata.

Log Context

Log “The security index [{}] mapping is for version [{}] but API Key metadata requires [{}];” classname is ApiKeyService.java.
We extracted the following from Elasticsearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :

                             ActionListener listener) {
        ensureEnabled();
        if (request.getMetadata() != null && false == request.getMetadata().isEmpty()) {
            final Version securityMappingVersion = securityIndex.getInstallableMappingVersion();
            if (securityMappingVersion.before(METADATA_INTRODUCED)) {
                logger.warn("The security index [{}] mapping is for version [{}] but API Key metadata requires [{}];"
                    + " the mapping will automatically upgrade to a supported version when the cluster no longer"
                    + " has nodes that are [{}] or earlier";
                    securityIndex.aliasName();
                    securityMappingVersion;
                    METADATA_INTRODUCED;

 

How helpful was this guide?

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?